There are quite a few 55+ communities in South Carolina, but the attached homes are not very common so as an expert in this market here are the list of senior-living retirement 55 plus single-family attached neighborhoods in SC where you can buy a condo or townhouse. Thinking about simplifying life without sacrificing space or community? For those aged 55 and better in South Carolina who prefer the ease of condo living but desire the feel of a single-family home, attached homes within 55+ communities offer a compelling option. These 55+ home residences provide the benefit of shared maintenance and amenities often associated with condos, while typically featuring individual entrances, private outdoor spaces, and a layout that feels more like a traditional house than a unit in a larger building. Explore the possibilities of owning a single-family attached home in a vibrant 55+ community and discover the lifestyle that awaits.
- Covenant Towers (Myrtle Beach)
- The Elms of Charleston
- Hammock Walk (Summerville)
- Rolling Green Village (Greenville SC)
- Rivergate (Little River SC)
- Blaize Ridge (Greer SC)
- The Villas at Charleston Park
- The Peninsula Luxury Condos (Charleston)
- Bear Grass (Greenville SC)
- Swansgate (Greenville SC)
- Agape Village (Columbia)
- Living Dunes (Myrtle Beach)
- The Ravines at Woodridge (Spartanburg)
- Hulon Green (Columbia SC)
MLS Listings Data
Total Listings: | 33 |
Average Price: | $199,169 |
Highest Listing Price: | $650,000 |
Average Days On Market: | 66 |
There are currently 33 condos & townhouses for sale in SC 55+ condo communities. 55 Plus single family attached real estate property listings in South Carolina have an average sales price of $199,169, ranging in price from $37,000 to $650,000. The average sq ft townhome in a 55+ condo community is approximately 1,237 square feet for a unit in one of the many SC senior-living & age restricted condo neighborhoods of SC. The largest property for sale is 2,599 sqft and the smallest 460 sqft. View property listings for sale by price, street, subdivision, age, property type, location, features, size, listing date, and time on MLS with an average of sixty-five days on the market.
CONSIDERATIONS – PROS & CONS
Attached homes typically offer a more hands-off living experience, as many exterior maintenance tasks like landscaping, roofing, and siding repairs are handled by the homeowners’ association (HOA). This can be a big perk for active adults & retirement seniors looking to simplify their responsibilities. However, that convenience often comes with monthly HOA fees, potential assessments and buyers should ensure they understand what services are included and whether the fees fit comfortably within their retirement budget.
Owning an attached home versus a detached home in a South Carolina 55+ condo community requires careful financial planning—especially if your income and assets are factors in your decision. Condos, villas, and townhouses often come with regime fees or HOA dues designed to cover shared maintenance and amenities, but these types of properties can be more vulnerable to unexpected special assessments or surprise repair costs. If the community’s financials aren’t well-managed, residents could be on the hook for sudden expenses that aren’t covered by the existing budget.
Attached homes usually provide a more maintenance-free lifestyle on the surface, but that convenience comes with some financial unpredictability. Amenities like pools, clubhouses, and shared infrastructure require constant upkeep, and when something goes wrong, the costs are typically shared among homeowners. Without a well-funded reserve or transparent accounting, residents may find themselves facing assessments that weren’t in the original plan.
In contrast, a detached home may offer not only more privacy but also a greater sense of control and predictability. Since you’re solely responsible for the upkeep of your home, you’re more likely to stay on top of potential maintenance issues and plan accordingly. While that can mean more hands-on involvement, it also reduces the risk of being blindsided by group decisions or poor community financial oversight.