Condo, obviously an abbreviation for condominium is legally understood to mean an “apartment style” form of real property “real estate” is individually owned. Otherwise an apartment house, office building, or other multiple-unit complex, the units of which are individually owned, each owner receiving a record-able deed to the individual purchased unit, including the right to sell, and obtain a mortgage lien. Furthermore, the use of land access to common facilities such as pool, park, sidewalks, hallways, heating system(s), elevators, and other exterior areas are executed under legal rights associated with the individual ownership. These rights to common facilities are controlled by the association of owners that jointly represent ownership of the entire piece. The difference between an “apartment” complex and condominium is purely legal, and here in the United States most recognize condo to mean ownership vs renting/leasing for apartment. Villa
– A Villa is really just another name for a condo or townhouse that is usually in a resort. Simply a more dressed up name for the same thing. Originally it was meant to mean an elegant upper-class country home, honestly now it is just a “snazzier” name for condo so those who purchase in a more expensive or “exclusive” community feel better about owning what amounts to a condo or townhouse.
How’s a “condo regime” different than a condo? Condo regime is generally known as an association of homeowners defined as an entity comprised of homeowners living or owning most specifically within a particular area, whose principal purpose is to ensure the provision and maintenance of community facilities and enforcement of the various covenants and restrictions. A condo regime does not necessarily mean the real estate owned are necessarily “condos”
as commonly known as described in the first tab. An HOA is created upon the recordation of a Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (“DCC&R”) in local land records. Each lot and common area is subject to the CCRs. Unlike a technical understanding of condominiums, the bylaws of the HOA are not recorded in land records. A neighborhood can actually be held or titled under a condo regime which is most easily understood by saying all the common property owned by the association (neighborhood) is managed by the association of home owners. Therefore all the land, common areas, exterior maintenance, common land, facilities are part of the HOA even though they may be single family homes. Rare, but it is the case, and one good example locally is Patriots Province in Mt Pleasant
Regime fees are the monthly, or quarterly payments due to the association to pay for your percentage of costs necessary to sustain the community’s assets. For example most regime payments (at least here in Charleston) pay for the insurances for the community (hazard, wind, flood, general liability), ground maintenance, amenities, exterior upkeep, repair and replacement. When you own in a condo or condo regime the monies paid into the association account is used to pay for new roof, new siding, insurances, pools, roads, tennis courts etc. It would then be the owner’s prudent responsibility to carry an interior insurance policy for protection against neighbors damage if pipe burst in your unit for example.
The truth is there really is no technical definition of a “high-rise condo”, but for all intents and purposes let’s say a “tall” apartment condominium building with at least 7 stories and an elevator. In the U.S., the National Fire Protection Association defines a high-rise as being higher than 75 feet (about 7 stories). MID Rise – Apartment or condos being from 4 stories to 7 stories in height. Leaving low-rise to mean anything under 4.
Having been in the mortgage industry once for over 13 years I know first hand that getting loans for condos isn’t as easy as it is for buying a single family detached property. There are a lot more factors that come into play with an attached home vs unattached. Reason being, condos are usually less desirable and become even more less desirable if the community has other factors in play most of which concern the occupancy of primary residence vs renters. From a lenders standpoint a community becomes more risky to lend in if the majority of the condo development is comprised of tenants vs owners. Except in a vacation or second home scenario because then they know it’s common place and standard procedure and most owners have their units in a professional vacation rental program for investment purposes. Whereas a regular suburban condo development was never set up for that purpose. For instance
: Fannie Mae
Loans require – A project for which all of the following are true:
FHA – Condominium mortgages are the best performing loans in their portfolio, accounting for only 5.79% delinquency vs 6.96% for detached single family. FHA Condominium Resource book states that prior to the change in FHA’s condo policy, the FHA’s market share of condos and single family moved closely together, even as the FHA receded from the market at the height of the bubble. Since the policy change, the two market shares have diverged steadily over time with the exception of 2013.
- at least 90% of the total units in the project have been conveyed to the unit purchasers;
- the project is 100% complete, including all units and common elements;
- the project is not subject to additional phasing or annexation; and
- control of the HOA has been turned over to the unit owners.
- The owner-occupancy requirement is 50% (Current legislation requests dropping to 25%)
- No more than 15% of units be more than 60 days due, excluding REOs. Dues for lender owned units are rarely received by associations in a timely fashion. Some state laws prohibit collection of delinquent assessments until 90 days past due, and many association governing documents do not consider owners to be delinquent until 60-90 days. (New law requests 90 days instead of 60)
- No more than 50% of units can be FHA insured already. (NAR requests new legislation increase it to 100%)
Townhouse also known as “row house”, without getting into too much technical jargon since they are much like that of condos, the easiest way to summarize is that the owner of each unit owns the dirt/ land and liability under, in front, or behind their unit. Most often recognized by home that touches the ground and has a small front and back yard. In most instances there is still a community HOA for the neighborhood common areas upkeep, and exterior maintenance unless otherwise stated in the by laws or CCRs.
PROs – when living in a condo every owner shares in the expense of the amenities (if there are such), usually lower prices unless living in high congested cities such as Miami or NYC for example. No responsibility of yard or property maintenance except for interior of your unit. If you live in a mid or high rise, depending on location often times beautiful vistas due to height vs being in a house closer to ground. CONs – Sometimes costly monthly or quarterly regime dues, and sometimes also yearly HOA dues as well. Risk of poor capital management by the HOA. For example if budget set out by the HOA isn’t properly estimated or mismanaged, the association of home owners (i.e. ALL owners) could be responsible for unforeseen out of pocket expense for necessary work in the community. Fear of “special assessments,” which is just a snazzy expression for pay up because we don’t have enough money to cover the cost of whatever it is that is needed to be done to protect your asset. A good instance could be all the roofs of the entire complex community need to be replaced and their is not enough capital in the budget to cover that expense or something unforeseen in the development came up that has to be addressed and monies weren’t set aside for such an event.